sarah palin is jewish (Her maternal grandfather, Schmuel Sheigam, was a Lithuanian Jew) : Miami IMC

What would Jews know about Jesus, the reputed King of the Jews? Better to ask a Roman emperor! After all, there are no Jews in the Gospels. Oh, I forgot about Joseph, Mary, Jon the Baptist, Elizabeth, James (actually, Jacob), all the disciples except Luke (the doctor!).

Were Matthew, Mark, Luke etc. "Jews?" The word translated now as "Jew" comes from a word for a RESIDENT of Judea: a Judean - and in 30 AD that included many Edomites! (About whom read Obadiah, Malachi etc.) Ones John Hyrcanus forced to become "Jews" and follow religion of his land after he defeated them around 130 BC. (Noted in "Antiquities of the Jews" by 1st century Jew historian, Flavius Josephus, see Book 13, Chap 9, line 257+)

So in 30 AD there were two major groups in Judea: real Israelites, and Edomites and half Edomites... like Herod! (The guy who tried to kill baby Jesus, remember?) His father's line was Edomite [it's in Josephus] and his mother an Arab (Cyprus). Search this out.

Now Jesus spoke to his CALLED folks - logically Israelites including dispersed ones in MEDIA [now Iran] that became Persia/Parthia and SW region "Elam" places whose men [lost Israelite] became Christians at Pentecost (Acts 2:7-9)!!
Note that Jesus came only to lost Israelites (Mat 15:24) AND THEY HAD BEEN PUT AMONG MEDES! (2Kings 18:11)... almost every modern "pastor" forgets this!

On the other hand, in Judea, many folks there ("Jews") did NOT believe Jesus and finally pushed to remove him (eg. see John 19:6) and he said they were NOT his people [thus not actual Israelite], and he said much more, in John 8 and 10.

Now the Bible is intensively about lineages. Study it from the start, and note lineages at start of Matthew & Luke.*
Note the Edomites were not favored by God! (Read Obadiah)

So... to be a "Jew" was for centuries really something quite contrary to Christians. (That is simply history, whether you like this or not. For example, see Martin Luther's famous tract on this group in his day.)

Note Jesus did not try to convert this hostile group, which remain "Jews" to this day - VERSUS JUDEANS ETC THAT BECAME CHRISTIANS IN FIRST DECADES AFTER 30 AD. Most Christians left that area (being drummed out by local leaders.) A boat of key Christians (Joseph of Aramathea, Mary, Lazarus, etc) sailed to Marseilles France, then most hiked overland to settle in Britain near Glastonbury! (See a rare study book, Celt, Druid, Culdee, by Isabel Hill Elder, on very early British Culdee church... later swamped by Romanism that had absorbed a pagan Roman calendar, holidays, and other error)

And when the Temple was burnt in 70 AD, most "Jews" just moved back to Babylon (where Judeans had been put, but many mixed and had lucrative careers there, and never returned to Jerusalem). Of course some migrated to other places too.
It was in Babylon that the tradition of elders (Mark 7) was finally written and became the Babylonian Talmud, which is the basis of most modern "Judaism" (except rare Karaites).

So.... for Sarah Palin to be of part Jewish ancestory as recent as a grandpa means she is not qualified to lead any Christians or teach us anything. And, she sprouts the myth that modern "Jews" are Israelites and their new state must be defended. Quite wrong!

In fact, a passage of Scripture (OT) predicted that in the end time the enemies of God will occupy the ancient high places - clearly old Jerusalem and its Temple area.

Can you find this? [Learn to hunt Bible quotes. Use a very good concordance like Strong's listing every word and the phrases it occurs in, using King James Bible as a base.]

Thus while the 1890s Zionist movement sought to seize old Israel land to show the world they're "chosen Israel," all they actually do now is to show just the opposite is true!

But you won' t hear this in government licensed "churches" that now intensively try to forget tough Bible truths.

You won't hear it from Sarah Palin, who is dumb on such facts (like most Christians). On top of that she is partly Jew via her maternal grandfather Schlomo Sheigam of Lithuania, if these reports are true.

Is it true?

I would suggest the (Lithuanian-American) Robert Balaicius research her roots as he specializes in roots! (He wrote YOUR INHERITANCE, Sacred Truth Min, Box 18, Mountain City, TN 37683. An excellent study on "lost" Isrealites today.)

PS: Speaking of lineages, the enemy will INSIST lineage is not crucial, and use Matthew 1 lineages to "prove" his case saying the Canaanite lady Rahab (Joshua 2-6) is in Christ's lineage. Wrong! NT Rachab is great great grandma of David, born around 1107 BC, while the OT Rahab was adult by the time Isreal ended its 40-year wandering (punishment) after the Exodus (around 1513 BC)... so the OT Rachab would be at least 180 years old (and probably 280+) when David was born, so CLEARLY THE TWO ARE NOT THE SAME PERSON!

And they'll say Ruth was in the ancestry of Jesus. True. And she was a (cursed) Moabite lineage person. False! She was from Moab.... a land Israelites conquered and occupied (but they continued used the term Moab/Moabite for a geogrphic area and folks living there). Numbers 21:21-26 tells of the conquest of land from Sihon king of Amorite who had earlier defeatd the MOABITES, as it ends saying in this passage.

And they'll say all this is irrelavant since the Great Commission (MAt 28:19) is to go to all NATIONS and baptize them... but Jesus said he goes BUT/only to "lost" Israelites and he only sends his disciples to them too! (Mat 10:6 & 15:24) He does NOT pray/intercede for all in the world (John 17:9)

A contradiction like this requires tight logic and hunting.

First use of "nations" is Gen 10:5 for the old Hebrew word gowy (also translated as "gentiles" in the same KJV line!) and it shows they are descendatns to Noah - perfect in his (adamic) genealogy "generations" (Gen 6:9)... as opposed to PRE-ADAMITES clearly shown to exist by geoscience history.
Largely omitted in the Bible, addressed to Adamites! But many groups now on earth descend from pre-Adamic groups.

So never let the anti-Scripture crowd deny lineage matters.

"Racism" was first used [Russian rasictov/rasistov] by the rabid atheist Marxist, Leon Trotsky, in his 1930 book "The History of the Russian Revolution" to silence Slavophiles who liked their own folks and tradition, rather than following Trostky - websearch more info! So never let use of this word against you silence you, it's just propaganda!
Called ones using this term "EVIL TROTSKYITES" instead! (Note Trotsky was a jew, born Lev Davidovich Bronstein.)